UK and Scottish governments urged to improve 'ad hoc' data sharing

Written by Matt Foster on 3 February 2016 in News

Report by the Alliance for Useful Evidence and the Institute for Government finds "reluctance to share data or lessons" 

An “ad hoc” approach to the sharing of policy ideas between UK and Scottish governments risk policymakers “missing out” on innovative ways to tackle social problems, a new report has warned.

The joint study by the Alliance for Useful Evidence and the Institute for Government think-tanks acknowledged that devolution has opened up new opportunities for the various governments to experiment with policy initiatives.

However, the report warned that there are still “structural and cultural barriers” limiting the exchange of evidence between Whitehall and the devolved governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.


Commons report questions civil service impartiality in run up to referendum

Civil service 'should remain unified' says senior Scottish Government official

A unified civil service? Professor James Mitchell on the role of the civil service

The stark political differences between governments across the UK has generated a “reluctance to share data or lessons” for fear of handing “ammunition” to political opponents, according to the authors.

“Cultural differences between the four political systems also seem to have increased, including in terms of how policy is made, how evidence is used, and even how certain concepts (such as wellbeing) are understood,” they add.

Existing bodies designed to bring the administrations together, including the Joint Ministerial Committee, are “not generally seen as providing particularly useful forums for evidence exchange”, according to the report. There is also a perception that the interchange of staff between Whitehall and the devolved governments has also declined.

The report praised recent Cabinet Office initiatives, including the new “One Civil Service” interchange scheme designed to give officials in UK departments, as well as those in the Scottish and Welsh governments, more opportunity to experience life working for another administration.

But it said the UK government-sponsored What Works Centres - set up in a bid to improve government’s use of evidence and encourage sharing of policy ideas - still have “a largely English focus”. The report urged the UK Government to clarify how the network fits in with the devolution agenda and recommended that devolved governments be engaged “earlier and more extensively” before new centres are set up.

UK Government ministers should also do more to encourage officials to develop relationships with their devolved counterparts, the report recommended, while it said there is scope for new “cross-government policy networks” and “department-level data-sharing agreements” to try and join up some of the dots.

“Devolution provides us with a wonderful opportunity to develop and share innovative and creative approaches to social policy, yet the UK has failed to live up to this promise of becoming a ‘living laboratory’ for policy exchange and development,” said Jonathan Breckon, head of the Alliance for Useful Evidence.

“Instead, learning across the UK, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales governments remains ad hoc and there appear to be few formal structures in place to support evidence exchange amongst civil servants across these jurisdictions.

“Systems to encourage comparable public service performance data are relatively underdeveloped and the cultural differences in political control and policy style between the four governments may also limit the appetite for learning and sharing.”

Former civil service head Lord O’Donnell last month warned that the soaring cost of housing in London was preventing talented officials from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland from gaining experience in Whitehall.

However, he warned against moves to give Scotland a separate civil service, arguing the referendum on Scottish independence had demonstrated the organisation’s ability to serve two political masters while avoiding major controversies.



Related Articles

What does Brexit mean for the fishing industry?
21 March 2018

Eurosceptics and fishing groups have expressed anger at the UK Government's approach to Brexit, but what will leaving the CFP mean for the industry?

National Cyber Security Centre warns UK Government and power companies of Russian threat
19 March 2018

Owners of critical infrastructure and providers of services are being urged to be prepared for Russian cyber attacks

Humza Yousaf: Councillor should be expelled from Labour following Islamophobic comment
19 March 2018

Transport Minister Humza Yousaf said “only expulsion will do” after a councillor made an anti-Muslim remark about him

Cabinet Brexit report warns UK will not be ready for customs changes by 2021
19 March 2018

The UK will not be ready for changes to the customs system in time for the end of the Brexit transition period, a report has warned

Related Sponsored Articles

Associate feature: 5 ways IoT is transforming the public sector
5 February 2018

Vodafone explores some of the ways IoT is significantly improving public sector service delivery

Share this page