SNP demands assurances over future of Peterhead Power Station

Written by Liam Kirkaldy on 16 February 2017 in News

SNP MPs Dr Eilidh Whiteford and Callum McCaig write to UK Government regarding future of plant

Peterhead Power Station - photo credit: Fred Coutts

SNP MPs Dr Eilidh Whiteford and Callum McCaig have demanded assurances from the UK Government over the future of Peterhead Power Station, telling Business Secretary Greg Clark that “it makes no sense for an existing gas plant to shut”.

Writing to Clark, the pair express concern over the UK Government’s decision to scrap its planned £1bn carbon capture and storage competition, with Peterhead one of the plants which had been in the running for the funding.

The warning follows a report from the National Audit Office which found the UK Government spent £100m on the competition before abandoning it.


Where next for Scottish energy policy?

UK Government wasted £100m on cancelled Carbon Capture and Storage competition, finds National Audit Office

Draft climate change plan targets 66 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2032

The letter says: “The current uncertainty surrounding Peterhead station is in part a damning legacy of your government’s decision to scrap £1 billion of support to carbon capture and storage, which was intended to create highly skilled jobs and stimulate large-scale investment to the area. The SNP will continue to condemn this counterproductive, reckless decision, and call on you to provide this sector with the support it needs and deserves.

“The continued operation of Peterhead power station is vital to retain jobs in the area, capture investment opportunities, and enhance Scotland’s energy production. At a time when the UK Government’s efforts to ensure the development of a new generation are proving unsuccessful and further closures of coal power plants are expected, it makes no sense for an existing gas plant to shut as a result of the iniquitous transmission charging regime. As such we call on you and your government to exhaust all options to safeguard the future of Peterhead power station.”

In its report last month, the NAO found the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy’s £100m spend on the second competition for government financial support for carbon capture storage did not achieve value for money.

The NAO reports that BEIS also spent £68m on the first competition on support for CCS, which it cancelled in 2011.

Releasing the report, Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, said: “The Department has now tried twice to kick start CCS in the UK, but there are still no examples of the technology working. There are undoubtedly challenges in getting CCS established, but the Department faced an uphill battle as a result of the way it ran the latest competition.

“Not being clear with HM Treasury about what the budget is from the start would hamper any project, and caused particular problems in this case where the upfront costs are likely to be high. The Department must learn lessons from this experience if it is to stand any chance of ensuring the first CCS plants are built in the near future.”



Related Articles

Renewable energy employment growth slows, finds REA
24 July 2017

New figures from 2015/16 show 125,940 people were employed across renewable heat, power, and transport in the UK

Brexit and Scotland's rural economy
21 June 2018

Concern over challenges faced by rural communities have been long-running, but with Brexit on the horizon, new ones have emerged

Promote the aquaculture industry to school leavers and graduates, urges HIE
23 May 2018

Highlands and Islands Enterprise highlights a gender imbalance in both the industry and education system, as well as an ageing workforce

Related Sponsored Articles

Share this page