Axing UK government departments 'would save taxpayer billions', says Treasury insiders

Written by Kevin Schofield on 3 January 2019 in News

Proposals to streamline UK Government departments being considered by Treasury officials

Whitehall - Dominic Lipinski/PA

Government departments should be axed or merged in order to save the taxpayer billions of pounds, Treasury insiders have told Holyrood's sister site PoliticsHome.

Senior figures believe the 25 Whitehall departments could easily be reduced without affecting government output.

They point out that in contrast, the government of the USA - which has a population five times the size of the UK - manages to carry out its functions with just 15 departments.

Under radical proposals being considered by top Treasury officials, the Departments for International Development, Exiting the EU and International Trade could be intergrated into the Foreign Office.

Meanwhile, the Departments for Transport, Housing, Communities and Local Government, and Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy could become a single ministry with responsibility for major infrastructure projects.

A senior Treasury source said: "The current Whitehall set-up is crazy – we have more government departments than the United States. Every time you create a new department it comes asking for more money – we need to start rolling that back.

"Why do we need a massive foreign aid department when we have the Foreign Office? Why have we got a load of different departments taking a piecemeal look at our infrastructure needs?

"If you cut the size of the machine you can release money for the front line – you could save billions rather than raising taxes."

But any move to slash the number of Whitehall departments would inevitably run into resistance from the civil service unions as a huge number of jobs are likely to be put at risk.

Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA union for senior officials, told PoliticsHome: "The idea that there are significant sums to be saved simply by merging departments is kindergarten economics.

"Unless government changes what it does, or does less - both of which require significant policy development - changing the nameplate on the front door of a department is no panacea  to delivering efficiencies. Indeed, every machinery of government change comes with the inevitable costs of merging IT systems and back office functions and creates months of distraction at a time when we need the civil service focused on the job in hand like never before.

"Instead of dreaming up easy headlines that the grass is greener in the USA or Singapore, ministers should be focusing on ensuring that the civil service is provided with the resources and skills it needs to face the biggest challenge it’s been given since the Second World War."

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

Trade unions back Perm Sec’s handling of Alex Salmond complaints
29 August 2018

PCS, Prospect and FDA unions defend complaints procedure they agreed upon last December

Kenny MacAskill: The new SPA can be a lesson for public boards
13 April 2018

Public boards have a duty to reflect society, not simply in terms of gender balance but at a much broader level, writes former justice secretary Kenny MacAskill

Scottish Parliament passes new gender balance law
31 January 2018

Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Bill passed at Holyrood by 88 to 28

Related Sponsored Articles

Associate feature: 5 ways IoT is transforming the public sector
5 February 2018

Vodafone explores some of the ways IoT is significantly improving public sector service delivery

Share this page