Health and social care Integration Authorities 'tokenistic' when it comes to engagement, warn MSPs
Engagement by integration authorities with patients and third sector often a "tick box exercise", warns the Health and Sport Committee
Health and Sport Committee - Scottish Parliament
Integrated health and social care boards set up to run services seamlessly are not taking engagement with stakeholders seriously enough, a group of MSPs has warned.
Following an investigation into the running of the integrated authorities in their second year of operation, the Scottish Parliament's Health and Sport Committee found a lack of consistency in stakeholder engagement.
This is despite promises from government about the third and independent sectors being "key stakeholders" in integration, with community engagement built into the statutory guidance on commissioning.
- Analysis: a year in health - supply and demand
- Scottish councils have not made transition to giving people choice over their care, Accounts Commission finds
During evidence sessions the committee heard concerns over engagement being ‘tokenistic’, ‘overly top down’ and ‘just communicating decisions that had already been made’.
The committee's convener Neil Findlay said: “We are now two years into the operation of IAs and they are clearly not working as intended. Too often we heard evidence from communities and health professionals saying this is not meaningful engagement, and a tick box approach is being applied. This needs to be fixed.
“Our Committee believes public engagement could be improved by having a dedicated community development staff member in each IA.
Event report: Health and Social Care Standards emphasise compassion, but do they proect human rights?
Public bodies urged to play their part in public health as the NHS “cannot do this alone”
The planning system is hugely important and it's time it was given the respect and attention it deserves
President Alison Evison said COSLA is determined to help to address period poverty