High Court orders UK Government to publish its air pollution strategy

Written by Nicholas Mairs and Liam Kirkaldy on 28 April 2017 in News

With UK air quality standards in breach of European law, High Courts orders Government forced to publish plans

Traffic - credit: Dominic Lipinski/PA Archive/Press Association Images

The High Court has ordered the UK Government to outline its air pollution strategy in May after a failed bid by ministers to delay its publication until after the general election.

With the European Commission issuing the UK with a ‘final warning’ over illegal levels of air pollution back in February, Mr Justice Garnham said the Government’s plans for tackling the issue must be produced on 9 May, despite ministers’ pleas, with the final draft to be finished by 31 July.

The appeal by ministers to delay draft guidelines came days before the original deadline of 24th April, with government lawyers arguing the release would fall foul of “purdah” rules, representing a “controversial bomb” for the Government.


EC issues UK with 'final warning' over air pollution

Warning over high levels of air pollution

Air pollution in Scotland is a “public health crisis”, says Friends of the Earth

Ministers argued for a delay in publishing the draft plan and consultation until 30 June and the final policy until 15 September.

The Government had been ordered by the courts to produce tougher draft measures to combat illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution, which is attributed to tens of thousands of premature deaths each year.

Mr Justice Garnham ruled that the case was a “matter of great urgency” and that a six or seven week delay would slow down the process of implementing the guidelines.

“These steps are necessary in order to safeguard public health… the continued failure of the Government to comply with the EU directive and regulation constitutes a significant threat to public health,” he said.

“Exposure to nitrogen dioxide [leads to] to 23,500 deaths annually in the UK – that’s more than 64 deaths each day.”

James Eadie QC, representing the Government said releasing the publication at the height of an election period would lead to its perception as a “Tory plan”.

“If you publish a draft plan it drops all the issues of controversy into the election … like dropping a controversial bomb,” he added.

But Mr Justice Garnham added: “I simply do not understand. How can it be that a six- or seven-week delay in the process doesn’t affect achieving the objective or getting to that objective in the fastest possible time?”



Related Articles

Wildlife crime falls by 8% in 2016
8 December 2017

While the overall number of recorded crimes fell from 284 instances in 2014/15 to 261 in 2015/16, the number of crimes involving hunting with dogs rose to its highest in five years

WWF Scotland and the British Lung Foundation call for low-carbon infrastructure investment
28 August 2017

With the Queensferry Crossing set to open to traffic this week WWF Scotland and the British Lung Foundation urged ministers to invest in projects which create green jobs, boost the...

Cuts to environmental spending have led to green indicators “declining or at best flat-lining”, MSPs warn
24 January 2018

Environment, Climate Change and Land Reform Committee welcomed a rise in spending on climate change but suggested budget cuts elsewhere are beginning to be felt

Islands Bill receives backing from rural affairs committee
22 January 2018

In a new report MSPs endorsed the Islands Bill, but recommended the Scottish Government includes a provision to carry out an impact assessment where evidence suggests the existing law has a...

Related Sponsored Articles

Associate feature: 5 ways IoT is transforming the public sector
5 February 2018

Vodafone explores some of the ways IoT is significantly improving public sector service delivery

Share this page