Tribunal finds police acted 'unlawfully' in data case

Written by Andrew Whitaker on 9 August 2016 in News

The Investigatory Powers Tribunal finds that Police Scotland acted 'unlawfully' and behaved in a 'reckless' way in data case

credit - Ian Britton, Flickr

A judicial tribunal which investigated whether Police Scotland breached spying guidelines has said the force acted "unlawfully".

The investigatory Powers Tribunal looked at the cases of individuals whose data was accessed as the force tried to determine how information about a murder probe reached the press.

In its finding, the tribunal ordered a journalist whose communications were intercepted should be paid £10,000 in compensation.


RELATED CONTENT

Detective accuses Police Scotland deputy chief constable of "misconduct" amid 'spying' row

Officers at centre of police 'spying' rule breaches decline Holyrood invitation


An independent inquiry into Police Scotland's actions has already been announced.

The Interception of Communications Commissioner ruled in November 2015 that officers had broken new spying regulations by obtaining communications data without permission on five occasions.

Officers had been attempting to find out how information about the investigation into the murder of Emma Caldwell in 2005 had appeared in the media.

Sir Stanley Burton, the commissioner, said the "failures" by police "could properly be seen as reckless".

This latest ruling from the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) came after a hearing took place in Edinburgh last month.

Two former police officers, and their wives, together with two serving policemen, took the action against the force to "complain of the collateral interference with their privacy".

Gerard Gallacher, a former police officer who carried out an 18-month journalistic investigation into the case, is to be paid £10,000 after telling the tribunal he had suffered an "invasion of privacy, familial strife, personal stress and strain and loss of long-standing friendships" as a result of Police Scotland's actions.

The IPT ruled the interference with his rights to freedom of expression were "serious in respect of the obtaining of more than 32 days of communications data".

Of the six complainants, only Gallacher and his wife had been seeking compensation.

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

UK Government to implement £70m satellite tracking system for immigration offenders
18 June 2018

The Home Office is looking for a software and hardware platform for monitoring those being prosecuted for immigration offences

Cyber security in Northern Ireland
18 April 2018

Event report: Cybercrime is the most secure way of committing crime, insists Klaid Magi, a leading European expert on the threat levels and how to combat them, “and everybody knows it."

Related Sponsored Articles

Associate feature: Who keeps your organisation secure?
19 February 2018

BT's Amy Lemberger argues that having the right security in place to protect your organisation is no longer just an option. It is a necessity.

Associate feature: 5 ways IoT is transforming the public sector
5 February 2018

Vodafone explores some of the ways IoT is significantly improving public sector service delivery

Share this page