Nicola Sturgeon urges Jeremy Corbyn to abandon "ridiculous position" on Brexit

Written by Liam Kirkaldy on 15 January 2018 in News

Nicola Sturgeon accuses Jeremy Corbyn of attempting to “deliberately mislead people” over the prospect of continued single market access after the UK leaves the EU

Nicola Sturgeon - image credit: Liam Kirkaldy

Nicola Sturgeon has accused Jeremy Corbyn of attempting to “deliberately mislead people” over the prospect of continued single market access after the UK leaves the EU.

Releasing the Scottish Government’s analysis on the effect of different Brexit scenarios on Scotland, the First Minister warned that the Labour leader’s “ridiculous position” on single market access was one of the biggest obstacles to forming a cross-party alliance aimed at retaining single market membership.

The Scottish Government analysis, Scotland's Place in Europe: People, Jobs and Investment, found that a hard Brexit would cost Scotland around £12.7bn per year by 2030, up to 8.5 per cent of GDP and the equivalent of £2,300 per person.

 

Speaking in Edinburgh, Sturgeon outlined plans to form a cross-party campaign aimed at avoiding a hard Brexit, including Tories and Labour members concerned by the prospect of losing single market access.

She said: “Who knows if Theresa May will even be prime minister by the time these negotiations conclude. There are voices within the Conservative Party that would argue for a softer Brexit and for single market membership, but, put that to one side, there is, I believe, a majority, outside of the Conservative Party.

“I think the bigger issue in order to get that majority, is to get Jeremy Corbyn off of the ridiculous position he is in. Either Jeremy Corbyn is still misunderstanding the position of single market, which given how often it has been pointed out to him can’t possibly be the case, or he is trying to deliberately mislead people with this line that you cannot be in the single market if you are not in the EU. I mean Norway stands as the living proof that that is just not the case.

“So the forces within Labour in this direction are getting louder and I believe that majority is there. The House of Commons can, if it chooses to, decide not to allow Theresa May to go down the road that is in her narrow party political interest and instead forge a path that is in the interests of the country overall.”

With the analysis also highlighting the importance of immigration to Scotland’s economy, the FM called on businesses and civil society organisations to come forward in opposition to a hard Brexit.

She said: “To be absolutely candid, I think one of the most important things over these next crucial weeks and months is to hear voices from outside of political and government processes. I don’t have a single conversation with business or civic organisations these days where concerns about Brexit, and concerns particularly over the supply of labour for businesses, if we see a restriction on free movement, are not top of the agenda. These voices now need to come to the fore and be heard.

She added: “If jobs and living standards are the driver here, rather than the internal politics of the Tory party, that [single market membership] is the direction we must go in.”

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

The UK's allies are now in no doubt that Theresa May is hopelessly capricious
5 February 2019

Theresa May is on a fool’s errand to demand the EU acquiesce to demands she previously said could not be met

Boris Johnson: No deal Brexit is the “closest to what people voted for”
7 January 2019

Johnson argued that Brits approached the prospect of crashing out of the bloc without an agreement with “optimism and self-confidence”

Brexit deal would hit UK economy by £100bn a year by the end of the next decade, finds study
26 November 2018

National Institute for Economic and Social Research warns the overall value of the economy would shrink by some 3.9 per cent by 2030 compared to staying in in the EU

Consultancy firms receive £1.6m in a month to help UK Government prepare for Brexit
29 October 2018

The Cabinet Office did not specify the exact nature of the work carried out, but the cash is believed to have been spent on new systems to be used in the event of a no-deal Brexit

Related Sponsored Articles

Share this page