Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland: Scots law 'is not serving women in this country'

Written by on 18 September 2015 in News

Scotland's top law officer discusses corroboration during Scottish Young Lawyers’ Association lecture

Scots law is “not serving women in this country”, the Lord Advocate has claimed, in his first public comments since plans to abolish the requirement for corroboration were shelved.
 
Frank Mulholland QC told an audience of young lawyers he stood by his calls for the centuries-old requirement in criminal trials to be scrapped, albeit acknowledged “it’s a matter for the Scottish Government”.
 
Justice Secretary Michael Matheson announced in April it was “neither appropriate nor feasible” for ministers to keep the proposal in its Criminal Justice (Scotland) Bill.


RELATED CONTENT

Lord Advocate: Crown has a voice on corroboration

Matheson refuses to rule out further corroboration consultation

Filming suspects in police vehicles a "massive expense", warns chief


However, Matheson said the Scottish Government “still believes that there is a case to be made” for its abolition and would consider whether to return to it after Holyrood elections next year.
 
The decision came after an expert review group led by former High Court judge Lord Bonomy recommended the requirement be retained when it comes to hearsay as well as confession evidence.  
 
No proceedings were taken in over 200 cases of alleged rape last year – despite there being a “very credible complainer” in many cases  as a result of insufficient evidence, namely corroboration, according to Mulholland.
 
“If I took a decision in over 200 cases of murder not to take proceedings because of insufficient evidence there would be an outcry,” he told an audience gathered in Edinburgh.
 
“So why is it that the most serious thing that can happen to a woman in Scotland, namely that she’s raped, sometimes violently, sometimes lack of consent with no violence, in over 200 cases we are having to put a pen through them because of the requirement for corroboration. 
 
“I know of no other country, no other country, in which there is a requirement for corroboration.”
 
The proposal had sparked concern within the legal profession at the time that a key safeguard in Scots law would be removed.
 
However, the Crown Office, Police Scotland and advocates for rape victims all came out in favour of scrapping the rule. 
 
Mulholland’s comments came in a Q&A after he delivered last week’s Scottish Young Lawyers’ Association annual lecture on human rights.
 
The Lord Advocate said that a combination of delayed disclosure together with an accused making no comment during police interviews following the Cadder ruling made corroboration more difficult.  
 
“That means, as a result of the law not recognising behavioural norms for women who are raped, that you cannot take these cases up,” he added.
 
“That is a real, real problem that the parliament is going to have to wrestle with and I have made this point to the Justice Committee. I do not think that Scots law is serving women in this country.”

 

Tags

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

Kezia Dugdale wins Wings Over Scotland defamation case
17 April 2019

Former Labour leader Kezia Dugdale wins a defamation case brought against her by independence blogger

Equal protection is about justice, not parenting styles
15 April 2019

The overwhelming evidence shows 'justifiable assault' causes harm, promotes violence and is a breach of children's rights

Scottish Human Rights Commission calls on Scottish Government to enshrine right to food in law
15 April 2019

SHRC uses a new report to call on public authorities to address inequalities in people’s access to adequate food

Share this page