There is a basic humanity at stake in the case of Clara Ponsati
Mandy Rhodes: Clara Ponsati faces a lifetime in a Spanish jail for nothing more than a belief in self-determination
Just as a 61-year-old St Andrew University economics professor was handing herself in to police in Edinburgh in response to a European Arrest Warrant, I was being interviewed by political heavyweight Adam Boulton on Sky.
We were sitting just half a mile from the police station where Clara Ponsati was relinquishing her passport as a condition of her bail as she prepares to fight attempts to force her back to Spain to face charges of, among other things, violent rebellion, sedition, misuse of public funds, and a possible jail sentence of up to 35 years.
This is a big story. An international story. One that ultimately, gets to the very heart of the European project and in some ways, exposes its flaws. But Boulton, in Scotland for the day, said that the UK media hadn’t really been following it. His comments echoed that of the BBC broadcaster, Jeremy Vine, who admitted he had never even heard of Ponsati.
The remarks were telling because this isn’t a Scottish story. It’s one for us all.
What if Ponsati had not been an academic in a Scottish institution but, let’s say, an Oxford don? Would there then have been such a muted response?
Indeed, would Boris Johnson, as foreign secretary, really have resisted making comment about the forced exit of an academic from his own alma mater to face what sound like trumped up charges in a foreign land? I think not.
So why are we here?
Ponsati is the most unlikely of radicals. A diminutive, white-haired academic who was professor of economics at one of our most hallowed seats of learning before taking a sabbatical to return to her native Catalonia to serve as education minister.
But the referendum that led to a declaration of Catalonian independence from Spain and her subsequent appointment to government was deemed illegal. Direct rule was imposed and the parliament dissolved.
Several high-ranking members of the Catalan cabinet were jailed while others, including Carles Puigdemont, the Catalan leader, went into exile and on the run.
And Ponsati, who had fled back to Scotland, is now one of five former ministers named in European arrest warrants issued last week by Spain’s supreme court.
The prospect of an academic in Scotland being forced back to Spain to be put on trial for her part in a peaceful, but illegal, independence referendum, has unsurprisingly appalled many supporters of Scottish independence who see parallels between Catalan separatism and their own cause.
But while the independence movement has done all the heavy lifting in terms of garnering support for Ponsati, it has also unwittingly helped to parochialize and polarise her cause which has inevitably become mired in tribal politics split down party lines.
Normally outspoken critics of heavy-handed political thuggery and persecution have been silenced by a wish to not add succour to one side of Scotland’s own constitutional tussle. And that is wrong.
Clara Ponsati faces a lifetime in a Spanish jail for nothing more than a belief in self-determination.
And while I’ll leave others, more qualified, to argue through the legalities of this case, there is a basic humanity at stake here which is being ignored by many of our politicians and that is to their moral shame.
The row over parliament’s right to vote on military action has sidelined the central debate over who was responsible for the deadly attack on Douma
Home Office letter shows ministers knew about the wider impact of the so-called “hostile environment” crackdown on illegal immigration in May 2016
David Davis, Boris Johnson and Liam Fox expected to press the Prime Minister over reports Number 10 is preparing for the possibility of a customs union post-Brexit
Mandy Rhodes: When Brexit demands that we reach out to the rest of the world, we reveal our truly nasty side