Soapbox: Avoiding FoI requests could be costly - Kevin Dunion

Written by Kevin Dunion on 2 April 2015 in Comment

The former Scottish Information Commissioner advises public bodies to take a clue from Clinton 

Some in authority believe that the way to avoid freedom of information disclosures is to use their personal email accounts to conduct official business. The most recent exponent is Hillary Clinton, who did so throughout her time as US Secretary of State. Over 30,000 work related emails have now been belatedly passed to the State Department. 

However, as Michael Gove, former Conservative Secretary of State for Education, found out, it is not a fool-proof FoI avoidance strategy. He used a private e-mail account, set up by his wife, to conduct exchanges with his special advisers on controversial aspects of his schools programme in England. Almost inevitably some ended up in the wrong hands, prompting demands that they be made public. Gove claimed that these were political, not official, exchanges and so were not subject to FoI laws. The UK Information Commissioner rejected his argument, saying that the primary consideration is the purpose of the email and whether the majority of its contents amount to the business of the department. 

But what is to stop someone in authority taking the risk and simply denying that they hold relevant information? Well, FoI law in Scotland makes it a criminal offence to destroy or conceal a record with the intention of preventing disclosure. Knowingly to delete or deny the existence of relevant information, even if held in a personal account, could lead to a fine of up to £5,000. And there is a greater prospect of cases coming to court in Scotland, as the time limit to bring prosecutions has been extended from six months to three years. 

If the bad example of using personal accounts to avoid freedom of information disclosure spreads, it is only a matter of time before we see someone in authority in Scotland charged with deliberate concealment.

Professor Kevin Dunion, director of the Centre for Freedom of Information, University of Dundee



Related Articles

UK Supreme Court ruling on employment tribunal fees welcomed in Scotland
26 July 2017

The Supreme Court has ruled that fees charged by the UK Government for employment tribunals are “unlawful”

Planned welfare cuts will "significantly reduce" income of poorest working-age households, finds IFS
27 April 2017

Cuts to tax credits, including changes which limit entitlement to two children, expected to reduce spending by around £5bn a year

Cyber threat to UK business is ‘significant and growing’
15 March 2017

A joint report from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency predicts future cyber threat trends

UK Government to investigate Scottish limited partnerships
16 January 2017

The UK Government has announced a review of limited partnerships following allegations that some in Scotland are being used for criminal purposes

Share this page