Holyrood Magazine Holyrood Conferences Holyrood Jobs
 

Holyrood Daily

Independent Budget Review announces findings
The first indications of the drastic squeeze on public spending Scotland...

Principal attacks “Luddite” claims about graduates
A prominent university principal and soon-to-be convener of Universities...

Scottish budget squeeze may last 16 years
The Scottish Government’s Chief Economic Advisor has revised the p...

Merging SNH and Deer Commission will combine expertise, says Minister
The merger of the Deer Commission for Scotland (DCS) and Scottish Natura...

First Minister’s Questions
Labour Leader Iain Gray kicked off the last FMQs of the parliamentary ye...

 
Holyrood Daily

Holyrood Daily

Click here for the Holyrood Daily Twitter

The first indications of the drastic squeeze on public spending Scotland is facing have been revealed, with tens of thousands of public sector jobs under threat.
 
The Independent Budget Review Panel report outlines a series of options for cutbacks for the Scottish Government and Parliament to consider, as the nation braces itself for the Comprehensive Spending Review in the Autumn.

 

The report suggests a shopping list of various options to be considered including not ring-fencing spending in the NHS, cuts of up to ten per cent in staff levels across the public sector by 2014-15, a review of the way universal services like free personal care and concessionary travel are funded, and possible changes to the status of Scottish Water.
 
The Review Panel, headed up by Crawford Beveridge CBE, alongside Sir Neil McIntosh CBE and Robert Wilson, subjected all departments to a review including the NHS, and it states “we could find no overwhelming rationale for protecting major blocks of expenditure”.
 
Commenting on the publication of the Panel’s report, the Chair of the Independent Budget Review, Crawford Beveridge CBE, said:
 
“There are very difficult decisions to be made over the next few months, requiring strong leadership not just in their making but also in their subsequent implementation.
 
“Clearly, there are significant short-term challenges.  However, important decisions also need to be taken about the future.  Scotland needs to decide what form and shape of public services it desires and can afford.  What do we want the state to do?  What level of taxes are we willing to bear for the provision of our public services?  How much should we change the mix between the state, the individual, the third/voluntary sector, and the private sector?
 
“Our Parliament and political parties have an opportunity to show strong leadership by creating the space for conversations to take place about the future of public services.  At the beginning of our devolved Parliament much was said about the opportunity for a new kind of politics.  If there was ever a time for this to be in evidence, now is that time.”
 
John Swinney MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth, commissioned the IBR in February to conduct a full and frank review of public expenditure in Scotland, without interference or influence from Government or Parliament.
 
The Finance Secretary invited opposition parties to talks on the findings of the Independent Budget Review. Swinney said:

 

"The Review findings consider a landscape that results from years of financial mismanagement of public spending, with Scotland’s budget forecast to shrink by 3.7 billion pounds in real terms over the next Spending Review period as a result of Westminster spending cuts. Some two thirds of the cuts planned at the UK level are the legacy of the previous UK Government, the other third the design of the Westminster coalition’s emergency budget that cuts too far and too fast.
 
“The Review can only offer options within our current powers, and it underlines the absolute need for the Scottish Parliament and Government to secure financial responsibility and the same economic powers that other nations have so that we can take decisions to boost economic growth and revenues in Scotland.
 
"We welcome the recognition from the Review of many of the initiatives the Scottish Government is already taking: to deliver greater efficiencies, with a target of 1.6 billion pounds this year; to reduce the number of public bodies - made easier by the passage of the Government’s Public Services Reform Act; to obtain savings through better procurement; to reduce the scrutiny burden; and its endorsement of us achieving better value in capital spending through the Scottish Futures Trust.
 
“We particularly welcome the Review’s recognition of the strongly held view, which we share, that water services should not be subject to privatisation. We believe that Scottish Water – which is performing extremely well – should remain under public ownership.
 
“The Government has made clear our determination to protect the vulnerable - which is why for example we will preserve existing eligibility for free personal care and concessionary travel.  And we will apply any Barnett consequentials arising out of the protection given to the health service by the UK Government to the health service in Scotland.
 
"We will not know the Scottish Government’s budget until the UK Comprehensive Spending Review is announced on October 20. Once that is done, and we have taken account of the views of Scotland, we will set out a Budget that is focused on sustaining economic recovery and protecting frontline services."

 
Shadow Finance Secretary Andy Kerr said:

 

"The report itself makes clear that the Government have enough information to come forward with their initial budget and in so doing allow the public and the parliament to be part of the debate.

 

"After all it is this Government which has had for the last three years the largest ever budgets but that also spent £1.5 billion in reserves, and even in those good times the SNP have been cutting teachers and nurses, so it is all the more vital for the SNP government come clean and bring forward their budget.

 

"Scotland now faces a perfect storm with Tory cuts coming on top of three years of SNP cuts. 

 

"Labour has made repeated calls for the Finance Secretary John Swinney to allow as much time as possible to debate Scotland’s budget. This means he needs to come forward with his own draft proposals when Parliament returns in September.

 

"Scottish Ministers can now add this report to the forecast from their own Chief Economic Adviser and the information provided by the UK Government at the time of the budget, so there is no excuse for further delay.”


Derek Brownlee MSP, Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Finance & Sustainable Growth, says:

“This is a total vindication of everything we have said in the Parliament for years and a wake up call to the other Parties.

 

“This is a new era in public spending and public services, and nobody should underestimate the scale of the challenges ahead.

 

“The report has taken 5 months to produce and sets out the tough choices we must face up to deal with the horrific legacy of Labour's debt and deficit.

 

“It deserves full and serious consideration and a full engagement with corporate and civic Scotland, and there must be an early debate in the Scottish Parliament.

 

“Scottish Conservatives have so far been a lone voice at Holyrood in being prepared to put savings on the table.

 

It is time for all parties to get a grip and work together to take the difficult decisions. We will not shirk our responsibilities, the others must not shirk theirs.”

To view the report head to www.independentbudgetreview.org and to have your say www.scotland.gov.uk/publicspending

A prominent university principal and soon-to-be convener of Universities Scotland has slammed politicians and commentators for “luddite” claims that there are too many graduates.
 
Following a survey by the Association of Graduate Recruiters this week that revealed that every graduate vacancy this year is attracting an average of 69 applications, compared with 49 last year, Professor Bernard King hit out at those arguing that public funding should be diverted away from universities and into vocational training such as apprenticeships.
 
The University of Abertay Dundee principal condemned such arguments as “short-sighted” and “deceiving”, claiming more apprenticeships would “never allow Britain to compete with such low-wage economies as China, India and South America, unless we are prepared to become a low-wage economy ourselves.”
 
Speaking to new graduates at the Abertay graduation ceremony today King said: “Some of you might have heard claims from some politicians and commentators that there are “too many graduates”, and that we should, instead, be concentrating on investing scarce public resources on more apprenticeships for sub-degree-level trades and craft skills.
 
“The workforce for the future needs more, not less, investment in higher-level skills at first degree and postgraduate levels.  To say, in a technologically sophisticated, urbanised and thus socially fragile world, that there is “too much higher education” is short-sighted, deceiving and Luddite.”
 
The principal acknowledged the severe public sector cuts coming forward but made the case for continued investment in higher education as essential for economic recovery.  
 
“University education is now a necessity:  expensive but absolutely essential for a nation wishing to survive and prosper in the modern world.  And in that world, investment in universities is growing – particularly in the emerging economies of China, India and South America,” he said.
 
“Closer to home, even economies who endured the financial storms alongside Britain, such as Germany and France, are investing more, not less, in their universities as a strategy to climb out of recession.
 
“Cutting investment in our universities risks seriously damaging a key component of the Scottish economy.”
 
King takes over the position of convener at Universities Scotland, the body which represents university principals, next month. His comments today indicate that he will be outspoken in his representation of the sector.
 
In light of the recent employment survey the principal moved to assuage graduates’ concerns about their prospects in the jobs market. 
 
“You might have read press coverage earlier this week claiming that almost 70 graduates are chasing every post, and that employers will reject anyone with less than an upper second,” he said.
 
“While stories such as this are worrying, you should know that the figures quoted represent only a relatively small number of large companies across the UK; they have no relevance for the thousands of small and medium-sized businesses and other organisations that employ the majority of graduates.
 
“The Confederation of British Industries has recently identified a predicted deficit in graduate numbers entering high technology, IT, manufacturing, science, engineering and management.  And in a recent letter to a major national newspaper, some of Britain’s most senior business leaders from companies including Shell, Network Rail, Centrica and GlaxoSmithKline, said that business looked to universities for graduate talent, research and innovation.  They urged the government to protect universities from severe cuts in funding in the next spending round.
 
“What no-one can deny is that you are still far more likely to get a job and have a long and rewarding career with a degree than without one.  The degrees you have received today represent a valuable investment in the future – both yours and society’s at large.”

The Scottish Government’s Chief Economic Advisor has revised the public sector finance predictions for Scotland, and now estimates it will take 16 years for public spending to return to 2009/10 levels.
 
The updated analysis compiled by Dr Andrew Goudie following the emergency budget states that rather than spending levels returning to present levels in 2022/23, it is likely to take until 2025/26. It also predicts that over this period, the Scottish budget will be squeezed by £42bn, whereas the previous report published in April estimated this figure would be between £25bn and £35bn.
 
As the exact details of future spending allocations to Scotland will not be available until the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) is announced in Westminster on 20 October, the document plans for a number of future scenarios.
 
The revised analysis also shows however, that a third of the spending cuts the Scottish Government faces were announced during the UK coalition government’s emergency budget last month, with only two thirds planned by the Labour government before the General Election.
 
Commenting on the predictions, Finance Secretary John Swinney said that the revised plan showed the UK coalition government was cutting too quickly and risked damaging the economy further.
 
He added: "Of course we won't know what Scotland has to spend next year until the UK Government announces its Spending review in October. It is not possible to lay out specific budget plans until then.
 
"But this analysis makes clear the scale of the task we will face in responding to Westminster cuts, both in the short and long term.
 
"That is why we have set up the Independent Budget Review that will report by the end of July and inform the debate all of Scotland must have ahead of our next budget. The Scottish Government's Chief Economic Advisor has written to the IBR with this updated analysis today.
 
"The Scottish Government is leading that process and is doing all it can to ensure we deliver full value for taxpayers' money across the public sector.
 
"This analysis further reinforces the case for Scotland to have the powers of financial responsibility so that we can grow the economy and boost revenues. The Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland report already shows a current budget surplus in Scotland of £1.3bn for 2008/09, compared to a UK current budget deficit of £48.9bn. Scotland needs to have financial responsibility as an alternative to a sustained period of Westminster spending cuts."

The merger of the Deer Commission for Scotland (DCS) and Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) will help deliver a better service for countryside customers, strengthen stakeholder relationships and increase efficiency by reducing costs and sharing resources, Environment Minister Roseanna Cunningham said today.

 
The merger, which was proposed as part of the Public Service Reform Bill introduced to Parliament last year, will see SNH taking on the role of promoting sustainable deer management and conservation.
 
At a reception at this year’s Scottish Game Fair at Scone in Perth, the Minister launched SNH’s first plan for its new role. Managing Scotland’s Deer sets out how the organisation will take over from the DCS, with former staff transferring to two new units – Wildlife Operations and Rural Resources Management. A transitional Deer Panel will also advise and train the current SNH boards, committees, management team and senior staff over the next three years.
 
Speaking at the launch, the Minister said: “Merging the responsibilities of the Deer Commission for Scotland and Scottish Natural Heritage will combine the strengths and expertise of both organisations and is a key aspect of the Scottish Government’s commitment to public sector reform.”
 
The Scottish Government plans to reform deer management further with the Wildlife and Natural Environment Bill, which was introduced to Parliament on 9 June and is currently being looked at by the Rural Affairs Committee. The Bill is intended to make further changes to deer management in Scotland, as well as revising and updating game laws and other areas of wildlife management.
 
The Minister spoke of how the merger and the Bill will affect the future of deer management, stating: “Alongside the Wildlife and Natural Environment Bill, the move will help ensure that Scotland’s wildlife is managed in a sustainable and balanced way for future generations and enhance relationships with wildlife managers which are founded on trust and mutual respect.”
 
SNH chief executive Ian Jardine said that the new measures would combine to “make our work more joined up and efficient.” He said: “Staff from both organisations are committed to help manage Scotland’s wildlife to benefit us all, now and into the future. Managing Scotland’s wildlife is not only needed for a healthy and diverse environment, it is also crucial for Scotland’s rural economy and tourism.”
 
To read more about the Bill, click here.

Labour Leader Iain Gray kicked off the last FMQs of the parliamentary year by challenging the First Minister on knife crime.
 
Following the passage of the Criminal Justice and Licensing Bill through parliament yesterday, in which the Labour Party’s amendment to impose mandatory six-month sentences for knife crime fell, Gray asked the First Minster why he supports mandatory sentences for gun crime but not knife crime. 
 
"Yesterday I met Kelly McGhee, whose brother Paul was brutally murdered on the 25th October 2009. He was stabbed outside his family’s home when he went to help someone else,” he said.
 
"Kelly’s question to Alex Salmond is ‘when more people are killed by the use of a sharp instrument in comparison to being shot, why is there is a minimum sentence in place for gun carriers and not knife carriers?"
 
The Labour leader pledged that mandatory minimum sentences for knife crime would feature in the party’s election manifesto next year.
 
First Minister Alex Salmond responded that public confidence in the police is at an all time high in Scotland and this is the reason why knife crime is falling.
 
However he added that Iain Gray chose to misrepresent things. There will always be sympathy on this side of the chamber for the victims of knife crime and their families but the idea of additionality in public spending will not be possible for many years, he said. The policies Iain Gray has put forward on minimum mandatory sentences would cost the public purse £140m. If the Labour Party come into government and spend money on this measure this will be sure to hit spending in frontline services such as the number of police on the streets, he warned.
 
7000 criminals have been released from prison this year as a result of SNP policies, Gray hit back. “But we shouldn’t be surprised that the SNP end this year by releasing 7000 criminals because they started it by releasing the Lockerbie bomber,” he added. 
 
“Why is the First Minister always on the side of the criminals and never on the side of the victims?” he asked.
 
The FM pointed to the broad based support for the SNP’s position on short term prison sentences from figures including Cherie Booth and former Labour First Minister Henry McLeish. Considering the number of people raising their voices in support “I think Gray is very foolish to politicise issue of criminal justice”, he said.  The SNP had already kept 77 of its 94 manifesto promises, he added. 
 
Conservative Leader Annabel Goldie tackled the FM once again on the collapse of the company behind last year’s Homecoming event, The Gathering.
 
“It is now all too clear that the SNP Government has been negligent. Yet the First Minister still won’t answer these key questions about the Gathering fiasco, which has left over 100 small businesses out of pocket to the tune of over £300,000,” said Goldie.
 
“The collapsed company, overseen by two Scottish Government quangos and an SNP Council, was reporting cash flow problems two months before the Scottish Government granted the secret loan.
Goldie accused the FM of being patronising in his response to questions about the collapse of the company, to which the Scottish Government had granted a loan, when he said he was delighted the Homecoming Year was such a success.
 
The First Minister responded saying that Goldie would be better informed had she been in the chamber for the Ministerial Statement on The Gathering yesterday. It is not a trite response to state the success of Homecoming, he argued. Neither was it an unreasonable action for the government to take to grant the company a loan.
 
Goldie said the FM could resort to bombast but small businesses were still owed money as a result of the failure of the company, with one small business still owed £11,000. That company and other small firms have today released a statement saying that they should have known been made aware of the loan made to the Gathering Ltd, she told the chamber.
 
The FM replied that the Auditor General has judged that the action taken by the Scottish Government in this case was reasonable.
 
Lib Dem leader Tavish Scott questioned the First Minister on why the Scottish Government was spending £1.2m on Patient Rights Officers, while cash-strapped health boards have to cut nursing posts.
 
“As Health Boards are cutting nurses across Scotland, this SNP Government is putting over a million pounds into Patients Rights Officers for a Bill with no rights,” Scott said.
“When medical staff are cut, patients will worry that they can’t see a doctor or a nurse, not whether they can meet a government bureaucrat.”
 
The Patient’s Rights Bill has been supported by patients’ groups across Scotland, Salmond replied.  With two thirds of the current public finances a legacy of the previous Labour Government and the other third a design of the new Lib Dem Conservative Government, talking about public sector job cuts is not Scott’s strongest suit, he advised.
 
 
Bookmark and Share
Environmental and Clean Technology

Search Holyrood.com

Opinion Poll

How long do you think the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition Government will last?