Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut non turpis a nisi pretium rutrum. Nullam congue, lectus a aliquam pretium, sem urna tempus justo, malesuada consequat nunc diam vel justo. In faucibus elit at purus. Suspendisse dapibus lorem. Curabitur luctus mauris.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours
Colour Chooser
A+ | A- | Reset
Home
Some students paying for degrees a "logical" step Print E-mail
Wednesday, 30 May 2007

The option of some students paying to study for degrees in Scottish universities is a logical one, according to chief executive of the Scottish Funding Council Roger McClure, who also suggested that universities could offer shorter courses as well as degrees.

McClure, speaking at Holyrood magazine's Higher Education and the Economy conference, said that there was little scope to decrease university costs, as the main option would be to have fewer staff for more students, and rely much more on ICT. This was not preferred by students, he said.

The Scottish system is expensive because of a high participation rate and a relatively long degree, but it is unlikely to get a great deal of extra funding because of other competing priorities for public funding, he said.

Universities could attempt to earn more, for example through knowledge transfer, but this means of generating income is a grafted on role for universities, and earnings are unpredictable and insufficient in scale to solve the problem of university funding, McClure added.

Other sources of revenue included employers, who were thought to be reluctant to pay for general courses rather than job-specific training, and benefactors, whose donations are unpredictable and who can impose constraints

The final option available is to generate money from students. While, McClure said, access to higher education shuold be based on ability to benefit not pay, "it doesn't follow that no-one should contribute".

The contribution that graduates make to the public good should be weighed up against private returns, and he also said that student loans should not necessarily be thought of as "debts" as they were contigent on students reaching a certain income before having to pay them back.

"We wouldn't talk about income tax as a debt," he pointed out.

He said that there should be some thought about the future utility of the three to four year linear degree programme, and suggested that there could be smaller chunks of study with defined outcomes that could be offered by universities.

This, he added, could mean increasing the participation rate of students, but creating a smaller system, and with higher unit funding from the same budget.

McClure also questioned whether free access to higher education should necessarily mean free degrees. However, he did stress that he was floating ideas and thinking, rather than calling for any specific way forward.

At the same conference, Dr Brian Lang, the principal of St Andrew's University, called for a thorough review of higher education funding, with a graduate tax as one option under consideration. He did stress, however, that "social justice was non-negotiable", and said that a graduate tax could be related to the earning advantage conferred by a degree.

"Hedge fund managers could pay more than charity workers," he explained.

He said that if Scotland fell behind England in terms of funding, it would take "many, many years to catch up".

"Catching up is very much more difficult than remaining in the lead. What are universites for? What is the funding mix? We really need to sort this out now."

Conservative MSP Liz Smith, the party's spokesman on schools and skills, said that the whole system of student finance needed to be reviewed. "Political acceptability might have to take the back seat, and I say that as a politician.

"Something has got to change... We have to look at graduate tax, although I do have problems with this idea, and also top-up fees. It is not politically attractive, but tough decisions have to be made."

However Dr Bill Wilson, speaking on behalf of the SNP, said that he thought it was still achievable to write off the graduate endowment, and said he still believed that paying off student debt was financially viable.
No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.


Related news items:

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 30 May 2007 )
 

Featured sites

Site news...


Translate holyrood.com: We are now testing Google translation on holyrood.com, for more information on this service click here . We hope this will improve access for our international visitors and clients. Let us know what you think at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
Visitors: 4089884
We have 1 guest online