Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

With the publication of the interim Calman Report, do you think –
 
Home arrow Holyrood news arrow News categories arrow Justice (HCL08) arrow Complaint lodged about Scottish legal services
Complaint lodged about Scottish legal services Print E-mail
Tuesday, 08 May 2007

The consumer body Which? has announced that it has made a super-complaint to the Office of Fair Trading regarding the operation of legal services in Scotland.

The body can make such super-complaints under the provisions of the Enterprise Act of 2002 if it believes that market features may be significantly harming consumers' interests.

It has said that the current structure of strict controls on how legal professionals in Scotland are allowed to practice and how consumers can access legal representation hinders market innovation, restricts consumer choice and may lead to higher prices.

Scottish legal services are currently regulated by two professional bodies, the Law Society of Scotland and the Faculty of Advocates.

Which? is calling for this to be deregulated in order to improve the services available to consumers, as the current restrictions prevent consumers from instructing advocates directly, solicitors working with advocates, advocates with other advocates and in general lawyers from working alongside non-lawyers to offer other services to their clients.

Which? believe that deregulation would allow conveyancers, mortgage advisers, surveyors and estate agents to work together to deliver packages of legal and other services, which would result in greater convenience and less cost to consumers.

Julia Clarke, principal public affairs officer at Which? said: “People should be able to access legal services from a range of organisations, not just traditional law firms. This should lead to improved standards of customer service and greater efficiency, improving price and quality for consumers.

“Although most of the restrictions can be removed straight away, deregulation will require the introduction of new legislation to ensure that people are not left vulnerable to unscrupulous practices. Also, regulation of solicitors and advocates needs to be overseen by an independent body to ensure that regulators put consumer interest first.”

Commenting on the lodging of the super-complaint, Douglas Sinclair, the chair of the Scottish Consumer Council, said: “We believe that there is a strong case for opening up competition in the market for legal services in Scotland. We welcome the broad thrust of this super-complaint, which builds on the in-depth work conducted by the Scottish Consumer Council revealing systematic problems in the way legal services are structured and regulated.

“Our own discussions with the Office of Fair Trading have focused on the urgent need for greater competition in Scottish legal services. Action by the OFT should help open up a market that has for too long neglected consumers and put the vested interests of lawyers first. We will be interested to see the terms of this super-complaint.”

The super-complaint has been welcomed by some prominent lawyers. Stephen Silver, a senior partner at Leslie Wolfson Solicitors in Glasgow, said: "We have always adopted a commercial approach to our business. We believe that in order to thrive we must apply the same rules as any other business. The laws of economics apply to us as they do to everyone else. We must be free to react to the needs of our clients. If our ability to provide a service is fettered by unnecessarily restrictive regulation our clients and our business will suffer.

“It is very difficult indeed, when barriers are dropping within the EU, to say as a profession we are different and these considerations do not apply to us. Lawyers are no different from any other business. Subject to the necessary safeguards for clients and the public we should have the same freedoms. We believe it [deregulation] will result in new and innovative services being developed and our profession being strengthened and not diminished in any way."

John Campbell QC, of Oracle Chambers, added: “The Which? super-complaint poses very important questions for the way in which law is practised in Scotland, and opens up the potential for a much more open market in the provision of legal services. It should be welcomed by lawyers as a whole, and by the Executive.”
No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.

Related news items:

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 08 May 2007 )
 

Featured sites

Site news...


This website has been tested as working under Firefox, and Internet Explorer 6 and 7.  Although the website will work in any of these browsers, users of Internet Explorer may experience some visual distortion due to the browser lacking support for widely accepted open standards.

We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, and will endeavour to ensure that the site will deliver its content irrelevant of browser choice. 

 We strongly encourage users to install the Firefox web browser, as it is both standards-compliant and free software.  

Please click here to visit the Firefox home page.


 
Visitors: 6523366
We have 1 guest online