Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

What should be the political priority for 2009
 
Home
Creative Scotland Bill – a ‘British muddle’ Print E-mail
Thursday, 21 August 2008

Creative Scotland, the proposed merger of the Scottish Arts Council and Scottish Screen, should be completely arms length from the Government or be run directly by the Culture Minister, according to a leading performing arts spokesman.

Lorne Boswell, Scottish secretary of the union Equity, said that the Creative Scotland Bill, due to come back to Parliament this autumn after being voted down earlier this year, was a “British muddle” in which the new agency could be subject to “insidious” direction from ministers.

Boswell, speaking at the Festival of Politics session Who Pays the Piper? - Funding Scottish Culture, said: “We have a choice; arms length or the French model of a Minister of Culture who is directly responsible. Jack Lang [the French minister during the eighties and nineties] was an invigorating figure.

He made it clear that he did not favour the French approach: “If we did that I would leave the country. But instead we have got this British muddle where it won’t even be the Minister ringing up; it will be some civil servant ‘letting it be known’ that things should be done a certain way.”

The Scottish Government had committed to ensuring that Scottish Ministers would not intervene in matters of artistic or cultural judgement but the Bill still required Creative Scotland “to comply with any directions made by Scottish Ministers and to have regard to any guidance issued by Scottish Ministers relating to the exercise of its functions.”

Asked by a member of the audience if a democratically elected figure might not make sense, Professor Jan McDonald of Glasgow University and Vice-President of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, observed that the principle of ‘arms length’ had been eroded in the eighties; an attempt by the Government to improve the governance of arts organisations had developed into more direct influence over the direction of organisations.

Boswell agreed with the sentiment of the questioner: “But if politicians want to take decisions [about what productions should be commissioned] then they should be accountable [for their success or failure]. If that was the case, I’m not sure there would be many takers for the job. What I object to is the backdoor way the power of direction was in the previous Bills and, I believe, will be in the next Bill.”

No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.


 

Featured sites

Site news...


Holyrood.com has received a facelift, to coincide with the last magazine of the season.

Along with the new template, we've also launched a forum for registered users.

Please feel free to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


 
- Home | Legal | Site Map | Contact | - -
Visitors: 7111351
We have 2 guests online