Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

What should be the political priority for 2009
 
Parties lay out stalls on education Print E-mail
Thursday, 26 April 2007

Labour, the SNP and the Conservatives went head to head last night at the Association of Scotland’s Colleges election hustings, where they defended their manifesto pledges on further and higher education, as well as skills academies.

Nicol Stephen, Minister for Lifelong Learning, who was down to speak for the Liberal Democrats, was notably absent, leaving an empty chair in the middle of the panel.

Deputy Minister for Lifelong Learning Allan Wilson said that Labour wanted to create the best education system in the world by 2020 and that “ambition was a virtue”. All of the £1.8bn allocated to Scotland by Westminster would be channeled into education, whereas other parties had different priorities, he said. He also said that investment in colleges would be at double the rate of inflation for the years covered by the upcoming Spending Review.

Derek Brownlee, the Tories’ finance spokesman, said that the Conservatives did not want to make promises about the amount of money that would go into education, because all parts of the public sector made demands, and “it isn’t fair to raise hopes”. He reiterated the Tories’ manifesto commitment to having a major education funding review, and said that Scotland could not ignore what was happening south of the border in terms of top-up fees.

SNP education spokeswoman Fiona Hyslop confirmed that the SNP was totally opposed to the use of top-up fees, despite this pledge not being included in the party manifesto. She also criticised the Executive for bringing in “additional variable top-up fees” for English students and medical students and said that, in contrast, the SNP would treat English students the same as Scottish students.

However, Wilson said that, seeing as the SNP did not intend to write off the debt of English students, this was a residency-based qualification and could be open to challenge.

Hyslop stressed that her party’s proposals to write off student debt and abolish the graduate endowment counted as “student welfare” funding, and that this was entirely separate from the funding that would go into colleges and universities.

Wilson slated the SNP’s plans to withdraw Scotland from UK Research Councils, but Hyslop said that real research collaboration was global and that this would continue whatever the constitutional settlement. She said that independence would not be a “huge panacea” for education, but that it would bring Scotland a sense of purpose as a nation.

Wilson said that money saved by the SNP from projects such as cancelling the Edinburgh tram scheme and airport rail link would be eaten up by the black hole in the party’s finances created by the Local Income Tax, but Hyslop said this was “nonsense”.

Wilson and Hyslop disagreed on the effect of proposed skills academies. Wilson said that the academies were largely aimed at “disaffected” school children and that they were a “way to inspire children to take up learning opportunities” but denied that there was any segregation of pupils involved. Hyslop argued that pupils who were “disaffected” were unlikely to be motivated, top-performing pupils.

She said that skills academies would be a new structure that would bypass the college sector and that Scotland should be better using what it already has in terms of schools and colleges rather than adding in an extra tier. Much more could be done, she said, in terms of freeing up time in schools for skills and trades, engaging SMEs with schools and colleges, and forwarding a mentoring agenda.

Wilson said that one of the biggest postbags First Minister Jack McConnell had ever had was when he announced proposals for a “Dad’s Army” of older mentors in the trades to work with young people on picking up skills.

Brownlee said that the Tories were “quite attracted” to the idea of skills academies but said they needed to be piloted so that if they were a failure, the government would not have gone up a “blind alley”.

On the issue of getting people above school leaving age, in particular those who had been made redundant from other jobs, retrained in order to participate in new industries, the speakers were divided.

Hyslop said a key issue was part-time workers trying to support a family – in particular, she referred to women who had been made redundant from Motorola and NEC jobs in West Lothian and needed to learn new skills for employment. She said that the barriers needed to be unblocked, and that there needed to be funding for retraining.

Wlson said that he had given money to Sector Skills Councils for three different projects to determine how to attract older workers back into learning. If Labour get in, he said that its proposed Full Employment Agency would work on developing confidence and skills of those who had become out of work.

Brownlee said that there was a case for people self-funding, and borrowing money to do courses because they would make money back on future earnings.

Stevenson College head Susan Bird warned on the creation of more agencies, such as the Conservatives’ proposed Skills Agency, saying that there was a need to learn lessons from all the different agencies and networks that had existed in the past. She stressed that more needed to be done about being creative and innovative with the skills agenda.

Workforce planning was also a key issue that was identified, with Bird saying that Scotland has a “timebomb” on its hands when it comes to the care sector.
No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.

Related news items:

Last Updated ( Thursday, 26 April 2007 )
 

Featured sites

Site news...


This website has been tested as working under Firefox, and Internet Explorer 6 and 7.  Although the website will work in any of these browsers, users of Internet Explorer may experience some visual distortion due to the browser lacking support for widely accepted open standards.

We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, and will endeavour to ensure that the site will deliver its content irrelevant of browser choice. 

 We strongly encourage users to install the Firefox web browser, as it is both standards-compliant and free software.  

Please click here to visit the Firefox home page.


 
- Home | Legal | Site Map | Contact | - -
Visitors: 7112833