Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

What should be the political priority for 2009
 
Home arrow Holyrood news arrow News categories arrow Justice (HCL08) arrow Tagging figures were wrong says Government
Tagging figures were wrong says Government Print E-mail
Wednesday, 16 January 2008

The number of Scots breaching electronic tagging orders actually fell 7.6 per cent last year, instead of rising by 61 per cent, according to revised figures published by the Government today. 

The number of Scots breaching electronic tagging orders actually fell 7.6 per cent last year, instead of rising by 61 per cent, according to revised figures published by the Government today.

The Criminal Justice Social Work statistics published on 4 December last year mistakenly included instances where warning letters were sent to those on Restriction of Liberty Orders – a Level 2 breach – as well as the instances where a court appearance was required.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said a review would be undertaken with Serco, the company responsible for managing, to ensure such an error does not occur again.

MacAskill said the revised figures show that there is a genuine role for electronic tagging as a non-custodial disposal option:

“This is clearly a serious error and led to accusations at the time that electronic monitoring is not working.  It does however provide further evidence that community penalties can play an increasing part in our progressive penal policy. We already know that reconviction rates are much lower for offenders who are sentenced to Community Sentence Orders as opposed to those given short prison sentences.

“A coherent penal policy must encompass a range of appropriate punishments, including prison for serious and dangerous criminals as well as tough community penalties for less serious offenders. It's therefore vital that we make the range of community penalties available to the courts as robust as possible to ensure they can be used with confidence in all appropriate cases.”

No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.


 

Featured sites

Site news...


This website has been tested as working under Firefox, and Internet Explorer 6 and 7.  Although the website will work in any of these browsers, users of Internet Explorer may experience some visual distortion due to the browser lacking support for widely accepted open standards.

We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, and will endeavour to ensure that the site will deliver its content irrelevant of browser choice. 

 We strongly encourage users to install the Firefox web browser, as it is both standards-compliant and free software.  

Please click here to visit the Firefox home page.


 
- Home | Legal | Site Map | Contact | - -
Visitors: 7108324