Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

What system of local taxation would you prefer?
 
Home arrow Holyrood news arrow News categories arrow Rural Affairs & Environment (HCL06) arrow Pathogens should not be regulated by DEFRA
Pathogens should not be regulated by DEFRA Print E-mail
Friday, 14 December 2007

Animal and human pathogens should be governed by a single regulatory framework, and handled by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) rather than DEFRA, a major review has said. 

The Callaghan Review was commissioned by Secretary of State for the Environment Hilary Benn to take forward recommendations made by the HSE in its report on biosecurity at the Pirbright site in 2007.

Hilary Benn said in tresponse to the review: “I fully accept all the recommendations made by Sir Bill Callaghan in this review.  In particular, I agree that DEFRA should not continue as regulator of laboratories handling of animal pathogens. This is because of the clear need to have a single independent regulatory body."

In Scotland, John Scott MSP, Conservative spokesman on rural affairs and the environment, said: "We have said all along that the Government should not act as both regulator and customer and we welcome the Government’s acceptance of this recommendation.

"This report highlights Defra’s weakness as a regulator and while the system clearly needs to change, it is a denial of his responsibility of office for Hilary Benn to claim that ‘any regulatory system is only as good as the people being regulated’. The Government cannot abdicate responsibility in this way and must face up to the reality that it was their negligent approach to biosecurity that led to the outbreak of foot and mouth which has cost the taxpayer £50 million and the farming industry more than twice as much.

"The UK Government’s handling of this situation has been a total fiasco from start to finish and Scottish farmers and crofters have been left to pick up the bill, as evidenced by the ongoing cull of ewes in Shetland taking place almost 1,000 miles away from the source of the outbreak.

"What is important now is that the Government acts upon Sir Bill Callaghan’s recommendations and establishes a regulatory framework which reduces the risk of accidental release of pathogens to zero."
No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.

Related news items:

 

Featured sites

Site news...


Have your say: We have introduced a comments system in our news and magazine article sections, submit your comments for approval. Your comments  will feature in the "Your comments" section.

 
Visitors: 4876761
We have 4 guests online