Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

How could we best increase organ donation?
 
Home
Holyrood "hustings" website to launch Print E-mail
Sunday, 11 March 2007

A new internet site that aims to create "online hustings" ahead of May's Holyrood elections is set to launch next week. The website, www.holyrood2007.org, provides an opportunity for candidates and citizens to use new technologies to engage in elections.

The academic research project between the universities of Edinburgh and Geneva aims to map and measure the way that parties, candidates and citizens use new technologies to engage in elections.

Navraj Singh Ghaleigh, who is the project leader for the site, which will go live on March 19, said: "It's recreating the circumstances of competitive politics online. That's one thing that's missing online. In real life, you have hustings and other such events in which candidates can thrash it out face to face, but there aren't that many of them and the people that that appeals to are probably relatively limited.

"What we're doing is trying to create an online hustings so that citizens who are online, which is more than half of Scottish citizens, can compare their candidates, what they have to say for themselves and how they compare up against each other."

Every candidate for the upcoming Scottish Parliament election will have a candidate profile, where they will have the ability to post their views in the election, allowing voters to compare candidates.

"There's no other space online where you can do that, where you compare the views of what people say, and if you don't like what a candidate for the Conservative Party's got to say, you can email her or you can respond to her blog. You can reply to them, and you can get a conversation going with candidates and between candidates in a way that currently doesn't happen.

"That's what we are interested in - do new technologies allow citizens to have a more genuine relationship with their candidates. Can they ask them difficult questions, will candidates respond, how do they respond?

"A lot of the questions about democracy today are about falling turnout, that's a real concern. We're actually looking at a slightly different issue, we're not looking at the quantity of democracy, as such, but rather the quality. We're trying to get people involved in a richer engagement with their candidates."

The website also has a facility to allow voters to answer around 35 questions on their political views and how important they feel they are, and will then be able to compare that to the views of the political parties, and to candidates.

"All the parties are interested and keen to be involved, I think they all see the value proposition. I think they're all excited about the opportunity to get their view out in a relatively simple way. They like the fact there are no complicated links on the site, it looks less like a website and more like a touchpad."

"One of the buzzwords of the project is political equalisation. Is the internet a tool for political equalisation, does it reduce the barriers to entry to the political process to such an extent that volume of party workers or volume of money is less important than quality of ideas? It's terrifically interesting to see how people who lack party machines behind them can deploy new technologies to their advantage, but it also has terrific opportunities for established parties to deploy new technologies."

"Candidates are given the opportunity to justify the choices that they made in the questionnaire, say I'm pro or anti Trident for the following reasons. The candidates have their flyers they give out, but how much can you say on that? They must feel frustrated that they don't really have the opportunity to give a fuller version of what they believe in. This gives them a fuller chance to do that.

"We're hoping that it enriches the electoral process from the candidates' perspective because they have more opportunities to speak and to speak in a more detailed and substantive way and hopefully, from the citizens' perspective, it's a satisfying process because they get to make comparisons between candidates and make their choice, when they ultimately make their choice, in a more informed basis."

The site also has areas which explain the electoral process and ballot papers, and will also contain a daily poll.

Candidates or agents interested in getting involved should contact Navraj Singh Ghaleigh at This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

No one has commented on this article.
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.


Related news items:

Last Updated ( Thursday, 15 March 2007 )
 

Featured sites

Site news...


Holyrood.com has received a facelift, to coincide with the last magazine of the season.

Along with the new template, we've also launched a forum for registered users.

Please feel free to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


 
Visitors: 6200219
We have 2 guests online