Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

This block of text is used as an example for the colour chooser module on this web site. This paragraph is functionally unimportant, and can safely be ignored.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours

Holyrood opinion poll

How could we best increase organ donation?
 
Home arrow Holyrood news arrow News categories arrow Rural Affairs & Environment (HCL06) arrow SEPA staff call for vote of no confidence in management
SEPA staff call for vote of no confidence in management Print E-mail
Friday, 16 November 2007
Index
SEPA staff call for vote of no confidence in management
Page 2
7. SEPA staff call for vote of no confidence in management
Spirit_of_Iona, Unregistered
The Union should ask itself one question Why did it encourage members to sign up and agree a Job match when the salary grading for those matches wasn't negotiated. The turkeys voted for their own Christmas and as such if the CMT are bad the union are worse. Lets's talk to Ronnie Real here what action will the union take.. Strike action.. yeh right! In the current financial situation when mortgage payments are in the minds of their members they'll bottle it. All the union has done is to delay yet another pay award beyond another Christmas
Thanks boys and girls...for acheiving diddley squat!
Posted 2007-12-19 13:18:31
8. SEPA staff call for vote of no confidence in management
Spirit_Of_Iona, Unregistered
Further to my last comment:

The No confidence vote by by Unison was not 93% of Staff it was 93% of the 65% or so of Unison members who voted, secondly following the leaking by Unison of confidential papers relating to the negotiations to selective staff members (finally to filter to the general work force) changes were then made to the scheme lowering the amount that green zone staff (the poorest paid)would receive.

As I remain neutral I feel that the CMT should look at the fact that some employeees have calculated that they are due to receive up to £6000* pre tax in back pay. The size of the backdated payments does seem 'embarassing' and 'divisory' given that other staff are red-circled. (* This equates to an increase in £250 pcm over the 24 month negotiation period).
Posted 2008-01-11 10:02:37
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.

Related news items:



Last Updated ( Friday, 16 November 2007 )
 

Featured sites

Site news...


This website has been tested as working under Firefox, and Internet Explorer 6 and 7.  Although the website will work in any of these browsers, users of Internet Explorer may experience some visual distortion due to the browser lacking support for widely accepted open standards.

We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause, and will endeavour to ensure that the site will deliver its content irrelevant of browser choice. 

 We strongly encourage users to install the Firefox web browser, as it is both standards-compliant and free software.  

Please click here to visit the Firefox home page.


 
Visitors: 6195782
We have 3 guests online