Primary Colour:
Primary Text:
Secondary Colour:
Secondary Text:
Tertiary Colour:
Tertiary Text:
Colour Picker
Preview
FeaturesTypographyTutorials
Module Title
Home
Module Title

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Ut non turpis a nisi pretium rutrum. Nullam congue, lectus a aliquam pretium, sem urna tempus justo, malesuada consequat nunc diam vel justo. In faucibus elit at purus. Suspendisse dapibus lorem. Curabitur luctus mauris.

Module Title
Module Title
Instructions

Select a predefined style from the drop-down or choose your own colours via the handy colour-chooser. When you are satisfied with your selection, click the "Apply Colours" button below to store your selection in a cookie.

Apply Colours
Colour Chooser
A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow Holyrood news arrow News categories arrow Transport (HCL05) arrow Congestion fears over removing bridge tolls
Congestion fears over removing bridge tolls Print E-mail
Monday, 20 August 2007

Removing tolls from the Forth Road Bridge will increase congestion, according to a study published today.

Despite MSPs voting at the end of the second parliamentary session to remove tolls from the Forth Road Bridge, the Toll Impact Study, which was commissioned by the previous Executive to examine the effects of removing tolls from the Forth and Tay bridges, advises against the move. 

Instead the report’s authors say that it could lead to significant extra traffic movement, increased traveling time with associated costs and adverse environmental impacts.

The recommendations come as Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth John Swinney today launched a series of public exhibitions about a Forth replacement crossing. 

Commenting on the “vital” need to gather public opinion on the issue Swinney said: "The Forth replacement crossing will be one of the biggest infrastructure investments ever seen in this country. It is vital to Scotland's future, and with such an important decision I am very keen to hear people's views on the proposals.” 

However, in light of statistics published today which show that road traffic levels are at the highest ever recorded in Scotland, he said that the Scottish government will also be looking for the public’s help to reduce congestion. 

He continued: “… if we are to keep Scotland moving in years to come, and achieve our aim of improving economic growth, it is clear that we need the public to help us on more than just the decision on the type of crossing. 

"Today's reports show that we face growing traffic levels on our roads. 

"The Scottish government will continue to do its bit  - we will continue to invest in infrastructure that tackles congestion, improves connectivity and reduces journey times, and we will continue to encourage people out of their cars.” 

Key to this, he said, would be giving people the choice of “excellent” public transport.  “We will build new rail lines, invest in strategic road links and improve the bus network. We also need more people across the country to make the choice to leave the car at home.” 

He added: "We must encourage change in the mode of transport used by the public to protect our environment and ensure our economy can develop without being constricted by an increasingly congested roads network."

However, Patrick Harvie MSP, Green Speaker on Transport, today said that Ministers’ plans to invest in bigger roads to tackle congestion were “ridiculous”.

He said: "It is plainly ridiculous for Ministers to claim that by investing in bigger roads, Scotland's congestion problems will be eased. It has been accepted since the 1970s that building more roads simply encourages more traffic. It's frankly bizarre for the Minister to appeal to people to leave the car at home whilst at the same time investing in bigger roads which attract people into their cars. The Minister appears to have his head in the sand. Congestion causes economic damage as well as environmental problems, and pursuing policies which make it worse is simply absurd.

"The previous Lib Dem/Labour Executive has left its legacy of increased traffic levels and the new administration appears hell bent on continuing the same unsustainable path. The government should accept the need for change, and give people alternative choices to the car instead of simply building capacity for more road traffic. Ministers appear unwilling to take the rational transport choices."

For further information on the exhibitions visit: www.forthreplacementcrossing.info

The Toll Impact Study is published today at www.scotland.gov.uk

For more information on the Statistical Bulletin Main Transport Trends see here

 

 

Readers have left 3 comments.
1. Congestion fears over removing bridge tolls
Charlie Halpin, Unregistered
This new government is no different than any other and will bribe the public to vote for popular issues and pretend to be concerned about the environment. To improve the environment requires unpopular decisions, Bridge Tolls and increased road taxes are essential but who will vote for this? So John Swinney now abdicates responsibility by telling the public to leave their cars at home. Why does he not do more to support those cyclists who risk life and limb to cross the Forth each day?
Posted 2007-08-20 15:23:47
2. Congestion fears over removing bridge tolls
Ian Sanderson, Unregistered
A tunnel is what's needed...

Drop a few sections intae the river..

If it's good enough for Glasgow......

Lotsa luck John..

Ian
Posted 2007-08-20 23:03:06
3. Congestion fears over removing bridge tolls
Graham Reed, Unregistered
Britain's efforts to reduce CO2, though desirable in setting a good example, will not stop sea level rise. Regardless of any independence outcomes, Scotland must adopt defensive strategies to protect our coastal, ecconomic infrastructure!

SO NO BRIDGES OR TUNNELS - BUILD TIDAL BARRIERS ACROSS THE FORTH & CLYDE [et al]. If we must have more road space[?] then put a four lane track on top, wind turbines along the sides [help pump the water]water turbines below & a lock gate for Grangemouth shipping! By 2050, the sea will rise enough to prove this to be the only sensible, long term strategy. All for price of two nuclear power stations [redundant with this plan]

Cllr. Graham Reed - Stirling [av. ht 10m above the sea!!]
Posted 2007-08-21 09:13:45
The author or administrator has closed this item for comments.


 

Featured sites

Site news...


Holyrood.com has received a facelift, to coincide with the last magazine of the season.

Along with the new template, we've also launched a forum for registered users.

Please feel free to This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


 
Visitors: 4138428
We have 1 guest online