Labour set to clash with Theresa May on repeal bill over missing human rights guarantees

Written by Kevin Schofield on 14 July 2017 in News

The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be transferred into UK law after Brexit

EU flag at Westminster - Image credit: Daniel Leal-Olivas PA Wire/PA Images

Theresa May has set herself on a collision course with Labour after it emerged the Charter of Fundamental Rights will not be transferred into UK law after Brexit.

The UK Government confirmed the controversial move as it published the 66-page EU (Withdrawal) Bill yesterday.

It will give ministers sweeping powers to change up to 1,000 pieces of EU legislation to make them compatible with the UK statute book without the need for a Commons vote.


RELATED CONTENT


The so-called ‘Henry VIII provisions’ will stay in place for up to two years, the legislation – formerly known as the Great Repeal Bill – said.

In total, the bill aims to transfer up to 20,000 EU regulations into UK law on the first day after Brexit.

However, the highly technical document does not specifically mention when that will be – although the working assumption is that Britain's EU membership will officially end on 31 March 2019.

But it is the revelation that the Charter of Fundamental Rights will not transfer onto the UK statute book which will cause the first Commons clash between the UK Government and the opposition.

It is understood that the Government believes a showdown is not necessary because the relevant provisions are already contained in other EU legislation which will be transferred into British law.

But Labour has said it will vote against the bill unless the UK Government changes course.

Shadow Brexit Secretary Sir Keir Starmer said: "Labour has always been clear that Brexit cannot lead to any rolling back of rights and protections.

“We need effective legislation that protects British workers and consumers, enshrines equality laws, enforces environmental standards and devolves powers across the country.

"The Government’s repeal bill falls short on all counts. It is simply not fit for purpose.

“The bill proposes sweeping new powers for ministers that are fundamentally undemocratic, unaccountable and unacceptable.

“It fails to guarantee crucial rights will be enforced; it omits the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and it does nothing to ensure that British standards and rights keep pace with our EU partners.

"Labour are putting the Prime Minister on notice that unless the bill is significantly improved in all these areas, Labour will vote it down in the House of Commons."

But a spokesman for the Prime Minister said: "The Prime Minister and others have been clear throughout that we wish to work constructively across parliament. What’s important is delivering on the will of the British people."

David Isaac, chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said: "We have been clear there must be no rowing back on people’s rights after we leave the European Union. 

“Rights derived from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, including important protections for children and older people, must be preserved for UK citizens."

Tags

Categories

Related Articles

Sturgeon has 'no intention' of taking referendum standoff to court
6 April 2017

Nicola Sturgeon says her argument with Theresa May over a second referendum "should be settled politically" as the Scottish independence debate goes global.

Sturgeon: Westminster's IndyRef block "has never been tested in court"
5 April 2017

Liberal Democrats warn the Scottish Government against "wasting taxpayers money" on a court case in pursuit of a second referendum following Nicola Sturgeon's Stanford speech.

Share this page